Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOD
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Derivatives
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Derivatives

The Journal of Derivatives

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOD
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
Open Access

Editor’s Letter

Stephen Figlewski
The Journal of Derivatives Winter 2011, 19 (2) 1-3; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2011.19.2.001
Stephen Figlewski
Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Volatility! The U.S. stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, moved down by about 22 points over three months, between August 3 and November 2, from 1260.34 to 1237.90. But if one adds the absolute values of the changes in the index day by day—the path it followed in the course of making that modest move—then it traversed more than 1,392 index points, which is high volatility viewed from a different perspective. A look at the VIX index of the S&P 500’s implied volatility paints another picture of expectations of future volatility. Over this period, the VIX ranged from 22.76 to 48.00, and the standard deviation of its daily changes was 4.19 volatility points. Not only are investors unsure about stock market value, they also appear to be highly uncertain about their degree of uncertainty.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

It is not hard to see lots of reasons to be highly uncertain about what the immediate future holds—in Europe, in the United States, across the Arab world, in China, and pretty much everywhere else. The list of physical and man-made real and potential disasters keeps growing, and each day seems to bring into focus one or more major issues, all of which are capable of causing huge economic effects. Will Europe agree on a bailout plan for Greece or will Slovakia balk at bailing out their wealthier but profligate neighbors? If they agree to the bailout, will Greek citizens (and Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese…) tolerate the austerity their leaders are being forced to accept in return? Will the politics surrounding next year’s U.S. election paralyze policymaking in Washington for the next year? What will China do about its inflation and its currency? The market grasps at shreds of evidence and responds in extreme fashion, bouncing from optimism that things will work out somehow to pessimism that they won’t. And we can expect to keep bouncing until the underlying issues come closer to some resolution.

While waiting for that to happen, let us turn our attention to this issue of The Journal of Derivatives. It begins with a fresh attack on what has nearly become the Holy Grail of interest rate derivatives research: reconciling the pricing of interest rate caps and swaptions within the same model. Payoffs for both kinds of instruments are determined by the same future interest rates, so the valuation models really ought to be consistent with each other. But real-world prices don’t cooperate. Rebonato and Pogudin’s approach uses cap contracts to derive an upper bound on the possible value of a swaption whose payoffs span the same future time periods. With considerable effort, they are able to fit both cap and swaption values with swaptions close to the no-arbitrage boundary most of the time but penetrate it only occasionally for brief periods. But fitting current prices entails building implausible future price behavior into the model. At the end of their analysis, the problem still exists, but insight has been shed on how hard it will be to devise a Grand Unified Theory of real-world cap and swaption valuation.

The next article also examines swaptions, but they are commodity swaptions in this case. Valuation models now need to deal with the dynamics of the term structures of both forward commodity prices and forward interest rates. Luckily, it has not yet become necessary to reconcile commodity cap and swaption pricing. The standard valuation technique is computer-intensive, Monte Carlo simulation. Larsson proposes an approximation for one key step in the modeling that leads to closed-form pricing equations and an orders-of-magnitude reduction in execution time.

Next, Ritter, Musshoff, and Odening offer a look at the information content of weather derivatives, specifically, futures contracts tied to average temperatures in three major U.S. cities. As anyone who has ever planned a picnic knows, while we may know something about the general properties of climate—it tends to be colder in the winter than in the summer, for example—tomorrow’s weather is hard to predict accurately, and the accuracy of forecasts for more than a few days ahead diminishes rapidly. A typical approach to pricing weather futures is to fit time series models on past temperature data, to allow for seasonal patterns and short-run serial correlation. The article explores how much extra information can be added by incorporating meteorological forecasts from the weather service. Weather forecasts help considerably, but only when the contracts approach expiration.

Retail investors seem to have enormous affection for securities that have unlimited, or at least large, upside potential but limited possibility of loss on the downside. Numerous securities (e.g., put options), trading strategies (e.g., portfolio insurance), and structured products (e.g., principal-protected notes) have been devised in response. Some of the structures are so complicated that the typical investor may have little ability to analyze them or understand them fully. Here, Deng, Guedj, Mallett, and McCann consider principal-protected absolute return barrier notes, which promise full repayment of principal plus interest at a rate that depends in an odd way on how far an underlying stock index has moved from its initial level over the life of the contract. Determining fair value for the notes is not easy, so it is not surprising that customers end up paying more than the payoffs are worth.

The final article discusses a set of issues that is becoming increasingly important in emerging financial markets around the world—how to reconcile derivatives with sharia law in Muslim finance. The key questions are how to handle these instruments within the strictures of sharia or, alternatively, how to provide the same functions in different ways that are not prohibited. One idea promoted by Western financial institutions is based on a kind of total return swap, which can theoretically transform any kind of cash flow into another, in this case, from a prohibited activity into an allowed one. Atallah and Ghoul argue, however, that this attempt to sidestep the rules is not likely to satisfy the religious authorities that worry about both the letter and the spirit of the law.

Well, with no apparent resolution in sight any time soon of any of the many uncertainties that are buffeting the markets, we had better buckle our seatbelts. We may end up going nowhere, as over the past several months, but it is likely to be a bumpy ride along the way.

TOPICS: Options, simulations, futures and forward contracts

Stephen Figlewski

Editor

  • © 2011 Pageant Media Ltd

PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Derivatives: 19 (2)
The Journal of Derivatives
Vol. 19, Issue 2
Winter 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Derivatives.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Derivatives
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Derivatives web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Letter
The Journal of Derivatives Nov 2011, 19 (2) 1-3; DOI: 10.3905/jod.2011.19.2.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Editor’s Letter
The Journal of Derivatives Nov 2011, 19 (2) 1-3; DOI: 10.3905/jod.2011.19.2.001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1074-1240 | E-ISSN: 2168-8524

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies