Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOD
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Derivatives
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Derivatives

The Journal of Derivatives

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JOD
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
Editorial
Open Access

Editor's Letter

Stephen Figlewski
The Journal of Derivatives Fall 2007, 15 (1) 7-8; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2007.694821
Stephen Figlewski
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Anyone who has been reading the Editor's Letters for the last several issues has heard me wonder how the financial markets could be so calm when elsewhere in the world, crises and catastrophes seemed to loom on all sides. Well, as of the beginning of August, it appears that the missing financial volatility has been located. It was first discovered hiding among sub-prime mortgages, but it has been rapidly extending outwards through the credit market and the stock market. Sorry I asked! This issue of The Journal of Derivatives starts off with an article exploring the interface between models and the market for swaptions. Swaption values depend on the dynamics of the underlying interest rates. Term structure models have gotten more and more complicated these days, since they need to be constructed to exclude embedded arbitrage opportunities for any security but to allow the yield curve to evolve with multiple degrees of freedom. Theoretically, the number of stochastic factors in a term structure model can be very large—as many as the number of future swap payment dates, for example. But a model that will be used in practice needs to be computationally efficient enough to support trading activity in real time, which limits the number of factors that can reasonably be used. Fan, Gupta and Ritchken ask, and answer, the question of how many factors are really needed for an adequate swaption model. Their answer is that for pricing a swaption, a single factor model is actually okay, but hedging performance can be significantly enhanced using 3 or 4 factors. Derivatives theory and practice also interact with regard to the well-known property that an option's value depends on the volatility of the underlying asset, but not on its expected return. In the basic Black-Scholes framework, the drift of the underlying stock is just assumed to be a constant parameter m, but mean reversion is a more plausible assumption for many kinds of underlyings. The problem is that expected return is irrelevant for option pricing and one only needs to know the volatility, but you have to take proper account of the drift process in order to estimate the volatility from market returns. Lo and Wang discussed this problem in the context of pricing an option on a single asset; in our second article Korn and Uhrig-Homburg extend the analysis to estimating correlations, where it is compounded by leads and lags in the price dynamics of the two correlated instruments. Extracting parameters from market prices is at the heart of the third article, too. Several of the newest derivatives are based on nonstorable underlyings, electricity being a prime example. Pricing must be done off of a forward curve, rather than off the price in the spot market. But actively traded electricity derivatives have Asian-style payoffs, based on the average price of the underlying over some time interval, and this is compounded by strong seasonality. Extracting a smooth implied forward curve from market prices of electricity derivatives presents a considerable challenge, that the authors are able to solve. The fourth article, by Jin, et al, also deals with implementation of an interest rate model. Mean-reversion in the rate and time-varying volatility are implemented as discrete jumps in the lattice, which can lead to computational difficulties. Jin, et al, show how to avoid them using an approach based on Ehrenfest functions. Our final article looks at flexible chooser caps. A cap contract is composed of a number of options, one caplet for each repricing date. A “flexible chooser cap” gives fewer caplets, but allows the holder the option of choosing when to exercise them, which significantly increases the optionality. Ohnishi and Tamba show how to sort through the optimal exercise strategy and the resulting valuation for the flexible chooser cap. It is the “dog days” of August right now, and much of the world has scattered to their favorite vacation, or at least

  • © 2007 Pageant Media Ltd

PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Derivatives
Vol. 15, Issue 1
Fall 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Derivatives.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Derivatives
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Derivatives web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Letter
Stephen Figlewski
The Journal of Derivatives Aug 2007, 15 (1) 7-8; DOI: 10.3905/jod.2007.694821

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Editor's Letter
Stephen Figlewski
The Journal of Derivatives Aug 2007, 15 (1) 7-8; DOI: 10.3905/jod.2007.694821
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor's Letter
  • Editor's Letter
  • Editor's Letter
Show more Editorial
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2021 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1074-1240 | E-ISSN: 2168-8524

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies